I am what is known as an early adopter, I try all the new shit, I was on Twitter early and got banned for being a Nazi or something when if you said anything anyone disagreed with you were a fascist.

Chat GPT is something that I have been playing with, 3.5 is as dumb as a plank, If OpenAI wanted to convince me that upgrading to 4 was a good idea they would have made 3.5 interesting enough that it was useful for more than creating outlines.

Here are my concerns.
Chat GPT cannot count, it cannot follow instructions and rehashes the same content in numerous areas, I tried writing blogs about photography, web development, carpentry and more. As a brainstorming device it’s good, to get an outline it’s accep[table, but as far as trusting it with creating original content that needs as much effort to edit and fact check as it would take me to do it from scratch anyway.

In the ever changing, fast paced world yadda yadda is one of it’s gotos. I wonder how many people are posting exactly the same AI generated shite, because they can’t be arsed to actually check it.

IT’s a boon for the spam content creator, but for the person serious about his business< I am not convinced, Convince me.

  • Sythic_@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Chat GPT cannot count

    Its not supposed to. Its a really advanced next word* predictor. Its not actually processing the math you ask it. Its predicting what is the most likely response to your question + the previous words* it wrote and it keeps doing that until it thinks its done. You have to work with that in mind.

    Its great at spitting out mostly useful code thats tedious to write by hand. No idea about other stuff, but it doesn’t do everything. You have to understand its limitations and how to bypass them with prompt generation. Its not about writing longer prompts, its best to provide the most details as possible with the fewest words.

    *Word is a simplification, it actually works with tokens, which are pieces or representations of human readable words.