Since there are more articles (quality ones) getting paywalled these days, I wonder if it would make sense to adopt a similar model to platforms like ShortForm (book summaries) and offer article summaries for a paid subscription plan?
For ref, Lenny’s Newsletter subscription costs about $20 bucks per month and Eric Newcomer’s costs about $27 a month. If I can offer recurring article summaries from both of them at a much lower cost of $5 per month for my users while bearing the cost of actual subscription on my end, it will be a win-win for both my users and me. 🤔 Then it’s a matter of volume and hoping that my own user subscriptions can offset my cost of subscribing to Lenny’s and Newcomver’s.
Probably will not pass copyright law unless you add to the posts.
Even then it’s dicey territory.
Conceptually, it’s a good idea, especially given the rise in paywalled content. However, there are significant legal considerations about repurposing content. It might be worthwhile to consult with a legal expert before diving in.
Just go have a look at whether or not having access to those articles includes the licenses to use them commercially yourself.
If I were Lenny or Eric, I would sue you.
Can you though? 🤔 this falls under transformative use in copyright law. I could be summarizing it in my own words and not copy anything at all.
Here’s your copyright infringement / breach of contract suit, have a nice day.
Can you sign up for a gym membership for $40 and then charge 100 people $5 to use your membership?
Even if you could, do you find this ethical?
Unethical and also illegal.
It’s an intriguing idea, but be cautious about copyright and content rights.
While the idea has potential, consider the copyright implications and also the unique value proposition. Maybe focus on adding original analysis to the summaries?
Interesting concept! If you can ensure it’s within legal boundaries and provide additional insights, this could be a game-changer for many readers.
What if I charge $4 per month?
Would you agree that by doing this, you are attempting to directly screw the original content creators out of income?