I think not.
It’s counterintuitive to ignore your strengths as a founder (ie: sales, marketing, etc)
The founders I speak with who want to learn to code assume it will help them understand their developers more. This is slightly true, but it’s an opportunity cost against time spent selling/promoting the product.
Products fail more due to poor PMF, not because founders can’t code.
Hiring developers who can communicate is a bigger force multiplier. (a hard requirement for me)
A technical project manager is even more ideal for providing the buffer between the founder and developers.
Curious how non-technical people on the fence of learning to code feel about this topic.
(if it’s a passion you seek, that is a different argument. code away)
I’m a developer working with business and from my experience, the most helpful knowledge a founder can have is domain knowledge. I mean you have to understand the business because the developers don’t know all the specifics of your field, but they can choose a tech solution based on all your needs.
It’s good if founders have some technical people on their side to communicate effectively with a development team, but it’s not necessary. If you want to start coding before developing a product, you must invest a lot of time in learning instead of doing business. I believe that everyone should do their own thing.