I have been building a startup for the past couple of years. Before any development work was done we sold our idea using a website, Typeform w/ Stripe, and manual delivery of the solution. We made a few thousand dollars doing this, and along with some other tests we had enough validation that there is a market we can build for.
We found a technical cofounder and by the end of 2022 (~4-5 month build) we had a bare bones MVP. The technical cofounder moved on with other projects, so we went looking for another. It was a 3 month process and while the replacement we found was competent, they didn’t have the time to move things forward substantially and left the team just recently.
Building a startup is tough. You need time, often around other commitments without being paid. The process from idea to MVP/beta takes months or longer, to find product-market can take years (and many examples in this post actually took much longer than they documented).
So I’m in the process of looking for a new technical cofounder (view to CTO) and I’d be interested to hear the experiences of others.
If you are a non-technical founder, how do you find an engineer/developer who can commit 20-30 hours per week before you build revenue or attract funding to pay the founding team salaries?
If you are a developer, what is the most important signal that a startup is worth spending that amount of time on around your other commitments?
We have some financial validation, we’re in an incubator program, operational costs are covered (from some early investment + incubator stipend + ecosystem grant), we have a solid deck and whitepaper that outline the vision, prepared to work with someone locally or 100% remote, maybe there is something we are missing…
I am doing the following:
- Posting to industry specific job boards
- Checking through YC Cofounder Matching (+ Cofounders Lab)
- Searching LinkedIn + cold outreach to local developers with experience that is a match
- Reaching out to contacts in my network, i.e. through the incubator and beyond
Where else would you be looking?
It seems that many developers, even joining as a cofounder, expect a salary right out of the gate. Where do I find those with realistic expectations and an interest to bootstrap, even if we don’t secure investment capital?
It’s something I’ve considered. But we are at a stage where the MVP/beta product is fairly advanced, which would make this a huge backwards step. There are some technical hurdles that would make using no-code particularly difficult to get the product where I think it needs to be.
Also, even if we could get the product traction using a no-code MVP (then raise funding and hire a CTO), I’d rather find our technical founder who is dedicated enough to join during the bootstrapped phase as, otherwise it’s a bit like a rich man looking for a wife… you never really know if she’s around for the vision or just for the money / security 🙂
So it sounds like for the 12 months of 2023, you’ve had/will have almost zero productivity on your app. What’s to say you’re not going to have those same results in 2024? 2025? If you find this magic man, are you really certain they’re going to be able to get you there still?
At least explore the idea of building it yourself on a no code platform. I have no idea the complexity of what you’re selling, but 95% of the apps I’ve built in my lifetime, for startups, SMBs, and enterprise, I could have built on sometime like Bubble.io. I now use no code to launch 100% of my SaaS platforms, the largest getting ready to scale past $5m ARR in 2024 on Bubble Enterprise. As a fellow startup founder, you’re doing yourself a disservice by not contemplating all possible channels to get to market.
Excuses are easy. Building, grinding, and succeeding are where the real challenge is at. Just do it now and you’ll thank me later.
We have had some forward progress on the app, just not as much as I’d like.
I did contemplate no-code and have explored it. I spent a day working through various Bubble introduction videos and guides, then another half day exploring the limitations. Everything points to integrating three.js into a HTML canvas on Bubble being code heavy (for which you still need a developer or learn to code) and with very poor performance even if achieved.