When quoting a job or service, one may calculate the profit via how much they’re making on the job itself, but this doesn’t consider the actual rate you’re making said profit. Therefore, when considering taking on new jobs or work, wouldn’t a better metric always be the profitability per hour, effectively this tells you the potential profit per year of doing that task and the cost opportunity compared to another job.
(Vs. If you were just considered profit vs profit of jobs, this may seem like one job is more profitable since it’s a higher payout but if it’s 3x the time, then you’re actually making more by doing the lesser job if you can pickup more of them).
Is my way of thinking sound?
Metrics are only as good as they reflect the thing you are trying to improve. If you want to improve how much profit you can get each job because your sales staff can only get 30 sells a quarter. Then tracking per job would be great. If profit is limited by hours worked then you should hire another employee.