I’m new to this sub and I’ve done some poking around. It seems that the unanimous advice in this sub for people looking to become an entrepreneur is ‘find a problem and sell the solution’.

I’m from a poor family and I’m just a simple working folk. I’ve been trying to think of a way to break free from that life most of my adult years but have never found a way to make it happen.

So my question is. Since I’ve been trying to find a problem to solve for most of my life and failing to do so. How can I make a shift to really find that problem I can solve? It seems most people in here have businesses. What problem did you solve and how did you figure out that problem to begin with?

  • kabekew@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t try to find some new thing. Find a successful product or service in a lucrative niche that you can do the same or better.

      • Disastrous_Pie5340@alien.top
        cake
        B
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Like roofing. Build a business that’s built on quality of service and it’s a lucrative niche within the construction space.

        Not trying to boil the ocean, just install a roof.

      • kabekew@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A high barrier-to-entry niche in a proven industry, which is more likely to have few competitors. If they’re doing really well, they can get lazy, not adapt to the latest technologies (they don’t have to because they’re already making good money), and let customer service lapse (customers have few other choices). That is a lucrative niche because the market is proven, there’s enough money being made to support the competitors, and there are clear things you can do to provide a better product or service.

        That’s exactly what I found with an expensive product used at my job in an aviation niche. It was expensive, poorly designed and made, had just a handful of providers worldwide, and they were all making good money ($100M market). I eventually got about 5% of the market so I didn’t make billions, but I made millions.

        I think existing, proven businesses that “only” might make you millions is a better and more straightforward path than trying to find some new billion dollar idea that has little chance of success.

        • tomatotomato@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This strategy is good but often can be rather hard and expensive because of the mentioned high barrier to entry? You need to be very good at attracting funds, talking to partners and investors and things like that, I guess?

          • kabekew@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think it’s easiest to work in an industry and niche you’re interested in, get paid to learn everything about it, then branch out on your own within that niche. The barrier to entry is the domain knowledge, not startup funds necessarily.

      • kabekew@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        High barrier to entry niches especially in the B2B world are starving for competition. Everybody for some reasons thinks low barrier to entry consumer market ideas when they think entrepreneurship. The real money is elsewhere.

        • WhizzlePizzle@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, but that’s not what you wrote.

          And high barriers to entry means exactly that - high barriers to entry. I suppose I could start a nuclear power plant for $10 billion. High barriers to entry - I’ll have it made when I bring that power plant on like in 20 years.

          Barriers to entry include:

          • Economies of Scale

          • Capital Requirements

          • Brand Loyalty and Reputation

          • Patents and Intellectual Property

          • Regulatory Barriers

          • Access to Distribution Channels

          • Switching Costs

          • Network Effects

          • Experience and Expertise

          • Government Barriers and Licensing

          • Access to Resources

          • Cost Advantages

          • Predatory Pricing

          • Brand Advertising and Marketing

          • Cultural and Social Barriers

          • Supply Chain Control

          • Government Subsidies or Support

          • Exclusive Contracts

          • Customer Loyalty Programs

          • Barriers to Exit

          • Time and Learning Curve

          • Environmental and Sustainability Standards

          • Crisis Resilience

          etc

          .

          Which of those barriers should I select when starting a new company and have no money, no brand to give loyalty to, no patents, no regulatory barriers, etc.

          I got fuck-all of any of those things above.

          I’m curious as to your response.

        • Rational_Philosophy@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Over simplified and easier said than done. More people would be doing what’s easy, that’s just the way it is. There’s very little out there that’s assumed hard but it easier than thought, waiting to be filled.